点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
冬日广东台山厨师“各显神通” “臭肚鱼”出品“香喷喷”******
中新网江门12月21日电 题：冬日广东台山厨师“各显神通” “臭肚鱼”出品“香喷喷”
作者 李晓春 郭军
近日，广东天气进入“急冻”模式，沿海地区海鲜市场多数是冰鲜海产品，而鲜活的“臭肚鱼”虽个头细小，但台山市茶楼饭馆的厨师却能“八仙过海，各显神通”，将其烹出系列“香喷喷”菜式，满足追求“鲜度”的食客的需求。
姜片蒸“泥猛”干 李晓春 摄“臭肚鱼”，在广东常被称为“泥猛”，喜欢以海藻、海中浮游生物和附着物为食，体表呈黄绿或黄褐色，且密布白色及小黑斑，其无鳞肉厚、鲜嫩味美，脂肪含量低，蛋白质丰富，营养价值高，经常食用可增强免疫力，是一种老少皆宜的小海鱼。
近日，广东台山最低温度低至5摄氏度，却不妨碍当地人一早到市场寻鲜。 李晓春 摄从寻鲜到食鲜，广东沿海居民不仅以海为生，更与海共生。近年来，台山市沿海几个镇在发展远洋捕捞的同时积极发展海上养殖业，其中川岛镇的网箱养殖业已形成一定的规模。
椒盐“泥猛”，酥香可口的一道下酒菜 李晓春 摄“我这边网箱养的虽以石斑鱼为主，但附近海域的‘泥猛’轻松穿过网眼，经常到网箱内外觅食。”台山上川岛沙堤渔港一养殖户说，坐在网箱边上垂钓，很容易钓到泥猛、金鼓、黄脚立等小海鱼。
用泥猛煮生滚汤，是台山乃至整个广东食肆中最常见的烹饪方法，煮出来的汤汁清澈偏白，且散发出鱼肉淡淡的鲜香。
用“泥猛”搭配其他小海鱼烹出的生焗杂鱼煲，上桌时香气扑鼻 李晓春 摄“别看鱼池里那些泥猛个头细小，但做出的生滚汤却非常鲜甜。”台山赤溪镇铁船餐厅的负责人林伟杰介绍，该餐厅旺季每天超10公斤的泥猛基本沽清，他们为客人点菜时，多数会推荐选择泥猛冬瓜汤、泥猛豆腐汤等，还建议加点芫荽调味增香。
平日喜欢喝点小酒的食客，对椒盐小海鱼情有独钟。在台山工作的河南人胡先生表示，台山沿海“椒盐泥猛”的做法地道，尤其是微辣、咸香、酥脆的口感，比较符合他的口味，是他特喜欢的一道海鲜下酒菜。
用“泥猛”搭配豆腐烹出的生滚汤，是广东食肆中常见的速成海鲜汤 李晓春 摄新鲜的食材容易激发厨师的烹饪潜能。“很多食客喜欢吃我们的生焗杂鱼煲，有喜欢选择黄脚立、黄花鱼、鲳鱼仔、火点等肉多刺少的小海鱼，也有喜欢捞些猪公鳄、泥猛、金鼓混在一起。”台山赤溪镇白宵围钓鱼农庄的厨师透露，他烹制的生焗杂鱼煲，多种小海鱼任意拼配，食客食过“舔舔脷”(粤语方言，很好吃之意)。
个头肥美的“泥猛” 李晓春 摄泥猛在广东茶楼饭馆中，应属难登大雅之堂的小众海鲜食材，常见于大排档、海鲜餐厅等，或烹汤，或煮粥，但在台山的星级酒楼也能找到它的身影。
“我们只选用本地鲜活泥猛，放在鱼池里养着，客人可以直观看得到，鱼池旁的伙计会根据客人下单的情况，捞出称重后，直接送入厨房加工烹饪。”台山台城街道一家四星级酒楼的经理介绍，该酒楼大厅堂食近期主推盐水浸泥猛、豉汁蒸泥猛、陈皮蒸泥猛等菜式。
开边晒制的“泥猛”干 李晓春 摄泥猛在台山还有另一种吃法，那就是姜片蒸泥猛干。在台山的海味市场，不时有去头或开边晒制的泥猛干销售，因鱼肉紧实、体无小刺、味道甘香而广受当地人青睐。
“这批泥猛干每公斤100元(人民币)。买回去千万不要砍成小块，直接整条冲洗一下，放入盘中，切点薄姜片或姜丝放在鱼干上，淋上花生油(可加点生抽)，即可上锅蒸。”近日，台山台城街道富城市场一海味店的老板娘招揽客人时叮嘱，蒸熟的泥猛干撕着吃，特别鲜香。
陈皮蒸“泥猛” 李晓春 摄泥猛，很普通且毫不起眼，却早已融入到台山当地人的一日三餐，唇齿间留下的，只有类似家常的味道。食材自身，并无贵贱之分，能将平平无奇的食材“化腐朽为神奇”，方显匠心独具。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)